
Essential Questions to Ask a Web Designer Before Hiring
Published: 18 February 2026

A Cumbria-based strategy consultancy contacted me a last year. They’d spent £14,000 on a redesign in 2024 with a Newcastle agency. The site looked sharp. Big hero images. Clean typography. Animated transitions. Eighteen months later, the founder asked me one question: “We’ve had a website for two years. Why isn’t it doing anything?”
We pulled up the analytics. The site was getting around 1100 visits a month from organic search, LinkedIn, and direct traffic. Nothing wrong with the volume for a niche B2B consultancy. The bounce rate was 71%. Average session: 38 seconds. Total enquiries through the contact form across all eighteen months: nineteen.
The site existed. The site did not work.
That gap – between a website that exists and a website that does its job – is the single biggest waste of money I see in UK small business in 2026. Owners spend five-figure budgets to end up with a digital business card that doesn’t bring in business. The brochure looks lovely. The phone doesn’t ring.
This post is what I tell clients in that situation. It covers the practical difference between having a website and having one that works, why having a website is not enough on its own, the four reasons most small business sites quietly fail to generate business, and the prioritised list of things to fix when the website is technically live but commercially dead.
Most small business owners I work with have one of two websites.
Type one – the website that exists. It’s live. It has a homepage, an about page, a services page, a contact form, and maybe a blog. It looks reasonable. The domain renews automatically. If you ask the owner “what does your website do?”, they say “it tells people what we do”.
Type two – the website that works. It’s live too. It also tells people what the business does. But it has a measurable commercial job – to generate a specific number of enquiries, bookings, sales, or calls each month. The owner can tell you how many enquiries the website produced last month. They can tell you the conversion rate from visitor to enquiry. They can tell you which pages bring in the most business.
That’s the gap. A working website has a job and you can measure how well it’s doing it. A non-working website just exists.
The non-working website isn’t always bad. It’s often perfectly competent – clean code, decent photography, professional copy. The problem isn’t aesthetics. The problem is that nothing on the site was designed to turn a visitor into a buyer. There’s no clear positioning in the first 5 seconds. No visible contact options without scrolling. No reviews or proof. No specific calls to action. No conversion tracking, so no-one knows what’s working and what isn’t.
You can pay £2,000 for a non-working website. You can pay £40,000 for a non-working website. Spend doesn’t determine whether the site works. Purpose does.
When I audit a “live but flat” small business website, the cause is almost always one of four leaks. Most underperforming sites have at least two of them. The worst sites have all four.
Leak one: the visitor can’t tell what you do in 5 seconds.
This is the most common failure I see, and the most expensive one. A visitor lands on the homepage. Within 5 seconds they want to know three things: what does this business do, is it for someone like me, and is it any good. If your homepage doesn’t answer those three questions above the fold on a phone, most visitors bounce. They don’t email you for clarification. They don’t dig through your nav. They leave.
Hero text like “Welcome to Smith & Associates – partners in your success” tells the visitor nothing. “Leeds-based commercial solicitors helping UK SMEs with contracts, disputes, and director’s duties” tells them everything. Specific wins.
Leak two: missing trust signals.
The visitor wants to know you’re real, you’re competent, and other people have worked with you successfully. They look for:
A site missing four or five of these reads as suspicious or unfinished. Some visitors won’t be able to articulate why they didn’t trust the site – they just didn’t.
Leak three: friction in the contact journey.
The visitor decides they’re interested. Now they want to get in touch. What’s in the way?
Every friction point above costs you enquiries. Each one is small. Stack three or four of them and you lose half the buyers who got as far as deciding to contact you.
Leak four: no proof the business is alive and working.
A site with no recent blog posts, an “all rights reserved 2019” footer, and stock photography that looks like it was bought in 2014 reads as a business that might have stopped trading. Visitors aren’t sure if they’ll get a reply at all.
The fix is small but specific: a date on the footer, an updated team photo, a recent case study or project from 2026, an active LinkedIn page linked from the site. The signal you’re sending is “we exist, today, and we’d like to hear from you”.
“I’m getting traffic but no leads” is the second-most-common question I get from UK small business owners. The first is “why is my SEO not working any more” (mostly zero-click compression, covered separately). The second is this – and it’s almost always a conversion problem, not a traffic problem.
The maths is easy. If you’re getting 1,000 visits a month and 5 enquiries, your conversion rate is 0.5%. If a typical small business site converts at 2–3%, you’re getting roughly a fifth of what you should be from the same traffic.
The leak is the site, not the volume. Doubling traffic on a 0.5% conversion site gets you 10 enquiries. Doubling conversion rate (to 1%) on the same traffic also gets you 10 enquiries – at a fraction of the cost. Quadrupling conversion to a respectable 2% gets you 20 enquiries. Better still.
The diagnostic for whether you have a traffic problem or a conversion problem:
Most small business owners spend their next pound on more traffic when they should be spending it on more conversion. More traffic doesn’t fix a broken site. It just produces the same disappointing chart with bigger numbers.
After auditing hundreds of UK small business sites, the pattern of what works is consistent. Five things, in order of impact:
1. Clear positioning in the first 5 seconds. What you do, who you do it for, where you do it. Above the fold. On a phone. In plain English. No “we believe in delivering exceptional outcomes” – that’s filler. Say what you actually do.
2. Visible contact options without scrolling. Phone number in the header. Email or contact CTA next to it. Sticky mobile bar with phone and WhatsApp. Anyone deciding to contact you should be one tap or one scroll away from doing it.
3. Real trust signals throughout. Faces, names, reviews (with the reviewer’s name where possible), case studies, credentials, address. The visitor needs to feel they’re dealing with a real business run by real people. UK service buyers especially weight trust signals heavily – we’re a cautious market.
4. Specific, low-friction calls to action. “Book a 15-minute call this week” beats “Schedule a strategy session”. “Get a quote within 24 hours” beats “Request a quote”. Specific commitments lower the visitor’s perceived risk of contacting you.
5. A site that works on a phone. Over 70% of small business site visits in 2026 happen on mobile. If your mobile site is harder to use than your desktop site – true for most small business sites I audit – you’re losing more than half your potential enquiries before the conversation starts.
A site that does these five things will convert at 2–4% almost regardless of sector. A site that doesn’t will convert at 0.3–0.8% almost regardless of sector. The difference between £900 and £4,000 of monthly revenue from the same traffic is whether the site does these five things.
Six practical jobs, in order, that take most small business sites from “live but flat” to “live and earning”:
1. Install conversion tracking. GA4, Microsoft Clarity (free), call tracking number if phone is your main channel. Until you can measure conversions, every change is guesswork.
2. Rewrite the homepage hero in plain English. What you do, who for, where. Within an hour’s work for most sites. Highest single-change ROI of anything you can do.
3. Surface contact details. Phone in the header. Sticky mobile bar. Contact CTA on every page. No more hunting for how to reach you.
4. Strip the contact form. 3–5 fields max for a first enquiry. Name, phone or email, what you need help with, optional notes. Long forms are an ego project for the business owner, not a service to the buyer.
5. Add trust signals. Pull your Google reviews onto the homepage. Put faces and names on the about page. Add credentials, accreditations, and a physical address (or at least a city). Add a recent case study.
6. Update the proof-of-life signals. Current year in the footer. Recent blog post or news item dated in the last 90 days. Updated copyright, updated team photo, updated portfolio.
That’s six jobs. A focused agency or in-house team can complete the lot in 2–4 weeks. The conversion lift typically shows inside the next 4–8 weeks of traffic. Most small business sites see enquiries rise 50–150% on the same monthly traffic from this single round of fixes.
The honest answer: treat the website as a sales tool, not a brochure.
A sales tool has a measurable job, a customer in mind, a clear positioning, an obvious call to action, and proof points that make the buyer feel safe deciding. A brochure is a passive document that describes the company in neutral terms and hopes the reader figures the rest out.
Most small business websites are brochures. The owner thinks of the site as “where people learn about us”. A working site is “where people decide to enquire with us”.
The mindset shift drives everything else. Once you treat the site as a sales tool:
The technical work that follows – the homepage rewrite, the form strip, the trust signals, the tracking – is just the implementation of that mindset shift. Get the mindset right and the work is obvious. Get the mindset wrong and you’ll spend £15,000 on a redesign that looks better and produces no more enquiries than the old one.
In 2005, having a website was a competitive advantage. Most small businesses didn’t have one. A clean, professional site set you apart.
In 2026, every small business has a website. The cost of building one collapsed – Wix, Squarespace, Webflow, ShowIt, dozens of templated builders mean any business can have a passable site for a few hundred pounds. The bar for “having a website” is on the floor.
That changed the maths of online competition. Having a site doesn’t differentiate you. What differentiates you is whether your site does its job better than your competitors’ sites do theirs. Buyers researching for a local solicitor will look at six firms’ websites in 20 minutes. The one that explains itself clearest, looks the most trustworthy, makes contact the easiest, and most clearly fits the buyer’s situation wins.
Three other shifts in 2026 make a working site more important than ever:
Having a website was the start line in 2005. In 2026 it’s not even that. Having a website that works is the start line.
The Cumbria consultancy I opened with is the cleanest “live but flat” case I’ve worked on recently.
Starting position (October 2025). 900 monthly visits, mostly from LinkedIn and direct traffic. Bounce rate 71%. Average session 38 seconds. Total enquiries in the 18 months since the redesign: 19. That’s roughly 1 enquiry a month from 900 monthly visits – a conversion rate of 0.1%, twenty times below where a B2B consultancy should sit.
The audit found:
The fix took six weeks across two rounds.
Round one (weeks 1–3):
Round two (weeks 4–6):
Result (April 2026, seven months in). Same monthly traffic (940 visits in the latest month). Bounce rate down to 49%. Average session up to 1m 47s. Enquiries: 8 in the latest month. Conversion rate: 0.85% — eight times the starting figure, and on track to hit 1.5% by year-end as the new pages get indexed and the case studies do their job.
Same site, same traffic, different commercial output. No more spend on advertising or SEO. Just a site that finally does its job.
I went through a phase between 2018 and 2021 where I sold redesigns that prioritised look over function. Clients wanted beautiful sites. I delivered beautiful sites. Half of them had the same commercial outcomes as the sites they replaced.
The mistake was prioritising what the client wanted to feel (“I’m proud of the site”) over what they actually needed (“the site generates enquiries”). I now spend the first conversation with every prospect making them tell me, in numbers, what the site is supposed to do for the business. If they can’t answer, we work on that before we touch the design.
If you’re commissioning a redesign and the agency hasn’t asked you how many enquiries the new site needs to produce, what conversion rate they’re targeting, or how they’ll measure whether it’s working, you’re buying a brochure. You’ll get something pretty. You won’t get something that earns its budget back.
Because every UK small business now has one. The cost of building a site collapsed in the 2010s and the bar for “having a website” is on the floor in 2026. What separates a working site from a non-working site isn’t whether it exists – it’s whether it does a measurable commercial job. Most small business sites are brochures that exist without earning their budget back.
Usually the new site looks better but doesn’t do anything different commercially. Same unclear positioning, same hidden contact options, same missing trust signals, same long form. A redesign without a commercial brief produces a prettier version of the same problem. Ask your agency what the new site is supposed to deliver in numbers before you sign off.
Almost always one of four reasons: unclear messaging (visitor can’t tell what you do in 5 seconds), missing trust signals (no faces, reviews, address, credentials), friction in the contact journey (hidden phone number, long form, slow promised response time), or no proof the business is alive (old dates, no recent work, stale copyright). Most under-converting sites have at least two of these. The worst have all four.
Install conversion tracking first (GA4 + Microsoft Clarity). Then audit the homepage on a phone with fresh eyes – does it pass the 5-second test? Then surface the phone number on every page, strip the contact form to 3–5 fields, add real reviews and faces, and update the proof-of-life signals (footer year, recent content, current team photos). Most sites see enquiries rise 50–150% on the same traffic from this single round of fixes.
Diagnose, don’t redesign. Open Search Console and GA4 – is the problem traffic, conversion, or both? Audit the homepage on a phone – does it pass the 5-second test? Walk through the contact journey as a buyer would – how many friction points does it have? Fix the highest-impact friction first, then measure. A full redesign is rarely the right first move; a targeted intervention almost always is.
Almost always a conversion problem, not a traffic problem. If you’re getting 500+ monthly visits and converting at less than 1%, the site is leaking enquiries every day. Doubling conversion rate is cheaper and faster than doubling traffic – and produces the same business outcome.
A website that exists costs you a hosting fee. A website that works pays for itself many times over every quarter.
The difference isn’t the budget. It isn’t the agency. It isn’t the design. The difference is whether the site was built with a commercial job in mind and gets measured against that job every quarter. Sites built to look good and not measured don’t generate enquiries. Sites built with a clear commercial brief, fixed when they leak, and measured every month tend to do their job and keep doing it.
If your site falls into the first camp – live but flat – the fix is shorter than you’d think. Six focused changes inside a month. A conversion rate that doubles or triples inside a quarter. Enquiries that turn into pipeline. Nothing magical, just a website doing what a website should have done from day one.
If you’d rather not run the audit and the rewrites yourself – that’s literally what we do. Contact us , we can audit your site, tell you what’s costing you enquiries in what order, and handle the fixes for you.

Published: 18 February 2026

Published: 8 December 2023

Published: 30 November 2023
We respect your inbox. While we may occasionally send you information about our services, you can unsubscribe at any time.
We protect your information as outlined in our privacy policy.